Producers say non-mulesing improves sheep welfare in Australia
New economic report highlights financial and sheep welfare success of wool producers who have ended mulesing
Calls for ending the controversial practice of mulesing have re-ignited, following the launch of a new report "Towards a Non-Mulesed Future" by socioeconomic consulting firm BG Economics. The report highlights the success experienced by Australian wool producers across the country using genetics to battle flystrike, instead of the controversial animal mutilation practice of mulesing.
Mulesing causes lambs to suffer fear and stress, as well as acute pain for up to three days after being mulesed, while their wounds take weeks to heal.
While at least 14% of Australian wool producers no longer mules their sheep, it’s estimated more than 10 million lambs continue to be mulesed annually.
Note: Any advertisements that may appear during the viewing of this video are unrelated to FOUR PAWS. We assume no liability for this content.
This new report, commissioned by FOUR PAWS and Humane Society International (HSI), collates data from a survey of 97 Australian wool growers in different states, climate zones and rainfall areas, and shows that it is largely good breeding choices (genetics) that will enable industry to end its reliance on mulesing, without compromising the producers’ bottom line nor exposing sheep to flystrike.
Put simply, wool producers can breed plain-bodied sheep without the wrinkles that cause issues and attract flies. These sheep are resistant to all forms of flystrike protecting their whole bodies for life, completely negating the need for them to undergo mulesing or any other physical mutilation.
“Mulesing is no longer accepted by many of the retail brands… we must evolve to accommodate this change in sentiment.”
Chad Taylor, non-mulesing wool producer, Central West NSW, Australia
To date, hundreds of thousands of people and over 300 brands globally have voiced their concern about mulesing, a concern that is only going to grow as people are increasingly interested in animal protection and ethical fashion.
“The results show that nearly all wool growers have experienced increased financial benefits and the welfare of their animals is also improved,” said Dr. Stephen Thornton, Principal Economist at BG Economics.
- 91.8% of wool producers believe animal welfare is improved by not mulesing sheep
- 77.5% of wool producers completed the transition to plain-bodied Merinos (flystrike-resistant sheep) within five years and 42.7% within two years
- 83.5% say transitioning to plain-bodied Merinos is not costly
- 84.1% have experienced an increased return on investment
- 86.6% would recommend to other woolgrowers to undertake the transition to plain-bodied Merinos
“The results speak for themselves. While for decades, there’s been concern around the costs of transitioning away from mulesing, and the extensive amount of time it would take, it’s now time to lay these to rest. Times have changed and producers across the country are finding it possible, and financially profitable, to end their reliance on mulesing,.”
Jessica Medcalf, Global Corporate Engagement Manager – Textiles at FOUR PAWS
FOUR PAWS and HSI commissioned this report to better understand the realities of the genetic solution to flystrike, and the results are extremely positive.
Towards a Non-Mulesed Future
Selective Breeding to Counteract Flystrike in Australian Merino Sheep
Through this report, FOUR PAWS and HSI hope more wool producers will feel confident in making the transition away from mulesing, and we can end both mulesing and flystrike, once and for all.
Posted on August 4, 2020 by Elise Burgess